Shared commitments

Build boldly. Treat people carefully.

Action never excuses harm, deception, exploitation, or disrespect. These standards protect community participation, conversations, builder work, and collaboration without becoming an ideological loyalty test.

Why the standards exist

Shared commitments with enforceable boundaries

Positive culture needs clear examples, fair review, confidentiality limits, consequences, and a route to question decisions.

Conduct

What participants commit to

Respect and dignity

Treat people as people—not inputs, status markers, audiences to manipulate, or sources of owed labor.

Consent and boundaries

Ask before involving, recording, quoting, introducing, showcasing, or expanding a request. A no, pause, or safe exit must be respected.

Privacy and confidentiality

Share only what is necessary and authorized. Do not expose private identities, evidence, contact details, financial data, or confidential spaces.

No harassment or exploitation

No harassment, discrimination, threats, retaliation, stalking, doxxing, scams, impersonation, coercion, deception, or exploitative labor.

Responsible technology and AI

No credential theft, malware, deceptive automation, illegal scraping, spam, or AI-assisted harm. Verify material claims and protect private data.

Appropriate requests and solicitation

Do not pressure people for work, money, purchasing, referrals, access, emotional labor, professional services, or introductions.

Conflicts and safe exit

Disclose relevant conflicts, stop when risk appears, and use the project or community exit route without retaliation.

Reporting

Raise concerns without retaliation

Builders, organizations, Network participants, partners, visitors, and people affected by ecosystem activity may use the concern route. Share only what is needed to review safely.

Report a concern

Review and consequences

Proportionate human response

A review may clarify facts, request information, set a boundary, warn, restrict, pause, remove, disqualify, end a project, correct public material, or refer a matter elsewhere. Action depends on available evidence, safety, authority, and applicable obligations.

Appeals or reconsideration

A decision may be questioned

When appropriate, a person affected by a moderation, eligibility, participation, or project decision may request reconsideration through contact or the concern process. Reconsideration does not guarantee reversal.

Updates

Standards will develop with real use

Last updated: 3 August 2026. Material changes should be dated, explained, and reflected in related project terms and forms.